White House Projects Long-Term Unemployment

The White House Council of Economic Advisers released its Economic Report to the President on Thursday, outlining the administration’s economic projections and policies. The report shows that the White House is expecting mass unemployment to continue for years, with only minor decreases from the current rate of nearly 10 percent through 2012.

According to the report, the official unemployment rate—which does not include those who have given up looking for work—will remain at 10 percent this year, slightly higher than its current 9.7 percent. In 2011, it is expected to fall to 9.2 percent, and in 2012 to 8.2 percent. Official unemployment is not expected to fall below 6 percent until 2015, and will remain above 5 percent through 2020.

The projections are in fact optimistic. They are based on the assumption that real GDP will grow by 3.0 percent this year (4th quarter to 4th quarter), and 4.3 percent in 2011. This compares to real GDP growth of -1.9 percent in 2008 and -0.5 percent in 2009.

The administration notes in a side comment that the high unemployment will keep wages low, stating, “Traditionally, the large amount of slack would be expected to put substantial downward pressure on wage and price inflation.”

The proposals that the report outlines to address the crisis are derisory, focusing largely on tax breaks, continuing the administration’s policy of rejecting any direct government hiring. High unemployment makes “a compelling case for additional measures to spur private sector job creation,” the report states.

Any measures must take into account that “the country faces significant long-run fiscal challenges,” the report stresses. It proposes tax breaks for small business and “additional steps to increase the availability of loans backed by the Small Business Administration.”

This latter proposal will do little to revive small business hiring. Large banks, the recipients of trillions of dollars of loans from the government, have squeezed off financing. The administration has proposed no measures to force banks to lend, the nominal purpose of the bank bailouts.

Other proposals include “initiatives to encourage energy efficiency” and the possibility of an additional $50 billion in infrastructure spending, funneled through private companies.

A significant portion of the 458-page report is dedicated to discussing the administration’s plans for cost-cutting, particularly with regard to health care spending, restating Obama’s position that “the projection of steadily increasing future deficits is largely due to the continuation of the decades-long trend of rising health care costs.”

Underscoring the long-term plans of the government to drive down the living standards of American workers, it stresses the need for a “transition from consumption-driven growth to a greater emphasis on investment and exports.”

The White House report comes as Senate Democrats are preparing to push through a “jobs” bill that largely follows the prescriptions set out by the administration. There has been some political infighting within the Democratic Party and between leading Democrats and Republicans over the precise scope of the bill and what assortment of tax breaks will be included, but none of the proposals contain any serious measures to alleviate unemployment.

On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid surprised some leading Democrats when he announced that he was not supporting a bipartisan bill worked out by Senate Democrat Max Baucus and Republican Charles Grassley, but was instead advancing a more pared-down version.

Liberal Democrats have hailed Reid’s move because it throws out certain tax breaks for Republicans. However, it also removes an extension on unemployment benefits and subsidies to help the jobless keep their health insurance.

Reid’s proposal would amount to $15 billion over 10 years, a sum that hardly rises to the level of paltry in comparison to the level of unemployment. Its centerpiece is a tax break for businesses that hire unemployed workers, waiving the 6.2 percent Social Security tax. The measure would provide a perverse incentive for employers to lay off older workers and hire those who have been out of work. Another component would give a $1,000 credit for business that retain new employees for at least one year.

Reid’s bill would also allow businesses to accelerate the tax write-off for capital investments. It would reauthorize spending on some ongoing construction projects and would give a small federal subsidy to states to help cover interest on loans for public works projects.

This last measure only serves to underscore the determination of the federal government to force states to balance their budgets by slashing jobs and social programs. In January alone, 40,000 local and state government jobs were eliminated.

The projected budget deficit for the states in the coming fiscal year is $142 billion, exceeding the $125 billion gap last year. These deficits are many times the amount the Democrats propose to spend on jobs over the next ten years.

The broader bill agreed by Baucus and Grassley was estimated to cost $85 billion over ten years and included a number of additional tax breaks, mainly for corporations, as well as the extension of unemployment benefits.

The move by Reid to scuttle the Baucus/Grassley bill, which was reportedly supported by the White House, reflects various conflicts over specific proposals. One significant factor, however, appears to be Reid’s concern that the Democrats be positioned to run in the November elections as the party of “fiscal austerity.” He told Politico, “Grassley and three to four Republicans would have voted for it, but all the other Republicans would have beaten the living s—t out of us [during the 2010 midterm elections], claiming the bill was too bloated.”

The Associated Press, in a report published on Wednesday (“Promises, Promises: Jobs bill won’t add many jobs”), commented that the broader Senate bill “has a problem: It won’t create many jobs.”

“Even the Obama administration acknowledges the legislation’s centerpiece—a tax cut for businesses that hire unemployed workers—would work only on the margins,” the AP reported.

The AP cited a report from the Congressional Budget Office that estimated that the Social Security tax break would generate only 18 full-time jobs per $1 million spent. Some 14.8 million Americans are presently unemployed, and 8.4 million jobs have been wiped out since December 2007.

The jobs proposals are part of a deliberate policy of the Obama administration, supported by Congressional Democrats and Republicans. The bailout of the banks has created conditions for record bonuses and profits for Wall Street firms, while massively increasing government debt. Not only will there be no measures taken to alleviate the jobs crisis; the government is determined to pay off these debts at the expense of the working class.

Urban Jobs Summit: Street Money For The Democracts

The White House will host a daylong urban policy discussion including mayors, county executives, governors, urban policy experts, and heads of various agencies … President Obama is expected to address the conference.

Discussion will include initiatives like Choice Neighborhoods, a new HUD program that provides poor neighborhoods not only with housing, but also social and economic benefits, like day care and farmers’ markets; and Promise Neighborhoods, a Department of Education program modeled after the Harlem Children’s Zone, to improve academic achievement and life skills by offering after school and weekend sports, social and arts activities.

The conference will include several dozen policy experts, including Bruce Katz, the director of the Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution, who developed some of the ideas that led to the creation of the Office of Urban Affairs. Bankers, planners, and advocates will also attend.

Finally, let's tell the truth about this so-called Urban Jobs Summit that will be held July 13 at the White House. It is basically a campaign rally for liberal Democrats for the mid-term elections. President Obama will pass out millions of dollars to city politicians who are Democrats to get the minority vote out in November. I knew this summit was a scam when I saw Rev. Al "Money Bags" Sharpton on the War Room with Wolf Blitzer talking about the upcoming summit. This is the Chicago Thug way of doing business if you want to keep power.

First Lady Now Requires 26 Servants

First Lady Now Requires 26 Servants, including a hairdresser and makeup-artist. The Annual cost to taxpayers for such unprecedented attention is approximately 1,750,000 without taking into account expenses of lavish benefit packages afforded to every attendant. Little did American voters realize the call for change would result in a establishment of a Obama Oligarchy. The discovery of additional attendants was made by D'Angelo Gore of factcheck.org and by calls to Katie McCormick Lelyyeld Michelle Obama Press Secretary. Mr. Gore launched his investigation of the First Lady's staff in the wake of a article that appeared in on the lastcrusade.org and Canada Free Press on July 7. The article, which became a chain letter viewed by millions of Americans, reported that Michelle Obama requires more than twenty attendants--More than any First Lady in U.S. history. It Provided the following list of White House staff members assigned to the First Lady.

Shared via AddThis

Is The EPA Supressing Or Witholding Information On global warming

Top Republican leader Sen. James Inhofe has asked for a investigation into the EPA alleged suppression of a report that questioned the Science of global warming. The 98 page report co-authored by EPA analyst Alan Carlin pushed back on the prospect of regulating gases like carbon dioxide as way way of reducing global warming. Carlin's report said the information the EPA was using was out of date, and that even atmospheric carbon dioxide level have decreased, global temperatures are declining. "He came out with the truth". They don't want the truth at the EPA. Sen. James Inhofe, a global warming skeptic, told FOX News.com he has ordered a investigation. "We are going to expose it". The controversy comes after the House Of Representatives passed a landmark bill to regulate greenhouse emissions, one that Inhofe said will be "Dead on Arrival" in the Senate despite President Obama Energy Adviser voicing confidence in the measure. A EPA official told Fox News.com that Carlin who is a economist not a scientist included no original research in his report. The official said that Carlin has not been muzzled in the agency at all "but stressed that his report was entirely "unsolicited". Dispite the EPA official remarks Carlin told Fox News.com on Monday that his boss National Center Of Environmental Economics Directors Al McGartland, appeared to be under pressure to reassign him. Carlin said the he does not know if the White House intervened to suppress his report but it is clear "they would not be happy about it if they knew about it, and McGartland seemed to be feeling the pressure from somewhere up in the chain of command. Carlin said McGartland told him he had to pull him off the climate change issue. Carlin said he, personally does not think there is a need to regulate carbon dioxide since, Global temperatures are going down". He said his report expressed a "good bit of doubt" on the connection between the two. The report noted that global temperatures was on a downward trend for the last 11 years, that scientist do not necessarily believe that storms will become more frequent or more intense due to global warming and that the theory that temperatures will cause Greenland Ice to rapidly melt has been "greatly diminished". Finally, Carlin said that he is concerned that science is being decided at the Presidential level.

WHITE HOUSE LOVES MSNBC.

It appears that the love towards President Obama does not go under appreciated at the White House because last Wednesday, a member of the Administration actually, declared in public. AT THE WHITE HOUSE AS WE ALWAYS LIKE TO SAY, WE LOVE MSNBC. this occurred at the Atlantic Council Awards Dinner hosted by Joe Scarborough and Mika Berzezinski. Therefore, after they introduced special assistant to President Obama for the Arts and Culture Kareem Dale, he began the video. Thank You. Thank you. Thank You for that great introduction. At the White House as we, always like to say we love MSNBC. Finally, I would love a News channel when a commentator like Chris Mathews says his job is to make President Obama a success. This shows that there is a media "Jihad" to make President Obama a success and they will cover-up all his mistakes. Watch the video below at the at the awards dinner.