NBC the Propaganda Wing Obama Administartion Attacks Beck, Limbaugh And O'Reilly

The left-wing loons over at NBC are showing there true colors as being the head of the propaganda wing of the Obama Administration. The statement made on Law And Order SVU that Beck, Limbaugh and O'Reilly incite violence is a false and reckless statement. Beck and O'Reilly showed a clip from the episode that aired Wednesday Night which showed a murder who was incited into violence by being a right-wing talk show host fanatic who constantly listened to Beck, Limbaugh and O'Reily. In this "Law And Order SUV" episode the three talk show host are called a "cancer spreading ignorance and hate". Glen Beck the true intellectual genius that he is proceeded to point out that there have not been any arrest at Conservative Tea Party Events, 9/12 March On Washington or Town Hall Meetings. Glen Beck exposes a laundry list of left-wing loons carrying out violence and destruction of private property across the nation. The liberal left wing media headed by NBC and MSNBC tries to portray Conservatives as dangerous people and should be attacked and discredited by all mainstream media sources. Therefore, where was "Law And Order SUV" when MSNBC commentator Keith Olbermann, Michael Moore and Democratic Party was calling President Bush and Vice President Cheney every despicable name that is not in the Websters Dictionary. Finally, Thank God that Glen Beck and countless numbers of Americans are exposing the Obama Administration as a group Socialist thugs who are trying to transform America into a European Socialist Society where the government controls every aspect of our lives.

Yale Project On Climate Change Use "Religious Leaders"

The Yale Project on Climate Change seeks to piggyback off of any and all established trust in religious leaders for mere political expediency. Its rationale of equating climate issues with prayer and established religious traditions are for the convenience of of converting its membership to climate agenda goals, and are a affront to to original intention of religious inclination. The Yale Project recognizes the importance of religious leaders in the public mind and seeks to use them to legitimize the carbon agenda. Though religious leaders don't rank as high as other tool of the climate propaganda, such as scientist, environmental organizations, weather reporters it is clear that pre-arranged advocacy will help advance there agenda. Further, the Yale Project recognizes religious cover will allow the penetration of more politically conservative or otherwise pockets of public opinion. The Yale Project On Climate Change states that religious leaders and communities should establish or expand religious coalitions on the environment and convene dialogues to develop common understanding and resources specifically on climate change issues across different religions and moral traditions. The Yale Project seeks to build on models like the National Religious Partnership for the environment while taking care to avoid tainting the unique positioning of the partnering religious groups.The project platform even advocates that religious leaders be prepared to work together both covertly and overtly on climate change. Churches in England did indeed hold a Day Of Prayer On Climate Change in August 2009, leading up to the United Nations Climate Change Summit In Copenhagen. Establishing green prophets has not only meant branding icons like Al Gore and David de Rothschild as saviors. Environmental themes have sought to bring religious adherents, for instance, through the "2008 Release Of The Green Bible"added liner notes and emphasis on environmental themes found in bible text. Finally, Religious conviction has been viewed as some sort of commodity to be translated into political and social power in the hopes of tipping the scales of any given agenda. For translation, The Yale Project is a distortion and a fraud on religious leaders.

Obama, New Rules Of Engagemnet In Afghanistan Will Cost Troops Lives

NATO and United States has issued new military rules of engagement in Afghanistan to limit civilian deaths. After, a air strike last year which reportly killed 90 civilians, including 60 children. Gen. McChystal has ordered new rules of engagement for American Troops in Afghanistan will focus on house searches saying that they will be lead by Afghan forces, and permission from homeowners should be sought. a limit on the size and weight of bombs used in air strikes were was imposed last year, but there is continuing anxiety in NATO about the counterproductive on civilian casualties on the majority Pashutun population. The new directives seek to sharpen tactical directives to give more clarity to commanders on the ground, one official said. It is a second attempt to try and re-educate commanders, to re-empathises how careful everyone should be" in carrying out air strikes and air support from ground troops. "Killing civilians is not the "best way to attract hearts and minds". It says since new rules of engagement was first implemented last year by Gen. McKierman the rate of civilian deaths have dropped in Afghanistan. The air strikes had greatly undermined local support for the efforts of international forces in the country. The new rules of engagement in Afghanistan could cost American lives because, soldiers will call for helicopters air cover if they were trapped by insurgent troops. Therefore, there will be scenarios in Afghanistan were U.S. Commanders citing the new rules of engagement will reject the repeated calls from solders trapped because of the possibility of having a large number of civilian deaths. These new rules of engagement are outrageous and it gives the insurgents a opportunity to attack American soldiers in large population centers and knowing that there will be no air support to cover them in battle. There will be hundreds of soldiers cut down in battle if the U.S. military follow these ridiculous rules of engagement.