Wednesday, November 7, 2012

10 Bad Consequuences Of Obama Reelection Victory

Mike Adams - As of this writing, it looks like Obama has a lock on the electoral college victory, although it simultaneously appears he has lost the popular vote to Romney.
What does an Obama re-election mean for the next four years in America? Now that he’s in his second and last term, of course, Obama no longer needs to restrain his actions according to popularity. He can simply unleash any desirable executive order and rule by decree, bypassing Congress as he has frequently promised to do.
This puts America in a very dangerous situation, given Obama’s well-demonstrated desire to destroy freedom and liberty in America. Remember: Obama is anti health freedom, anti food freedom, anti GMO labeling, anti medical freedom and anti farm freedom. He’s the one who issued an executive order claiming government ownership over all farms and farm equipment, in case you forgot that little fact.
He’s also the guy who just recently issued an executive order merging Homeland Security with local corporate entities to grant the executive branch of government a power monopoly over the nation, bypassing the courts and Congress. You probably haven’t even heard about that one, because he secretly signed it during Hurricane Sandy.
Given Obama’s atrocious track record on freedom during his first four years in the White House, here are my top 10 predictions for the next four (if America even lasts that long before ripping itself apart):
#1) Huge expansion of TSA and the surveillance state
Watch for TSA to expand its occupation of America by setting up checkpoints on roadways, sporting events, malls and “surprise” locations. Expect to see TSA agents become even more belligerent and lawless as they ramp up their sexual molestation of innocent victims.
#2) Expansion of secret arrests of American citizens
Obama secretly signed the NDAA, legalizing the secret arrests of U.S. citizens while denying them due process. Obama also authorized secret “kill lists” that claim to authorize the U.S. government to assassinate targeted individuals.
With his re-election in place, expect Obama to start issuing a mass of “kill orders” that will even start targeting political opponents.
#3) Acceleration of national debt blowout and endless fiat currency creation
Under Obama, the national debt experienced a massive blowout where Obama added trillions of dollars to the existing debt: www.USdebtclock.org
Right now, Obama is overseeing a trillion dollars a year in additional debt — an amount that simply cannot be sustained without running smack into a financial catastrophe. It now appears that financial collapse it going to occur under Obama, not Romney.
#4) Rapid expansion of GMOs and USDA collusion
Monsanto and the biotech corporations have thrived under the Obama administration thanks to USDA collusion and scientific fraud.
Over the next four years, expect GMOs to dominate the U.S. food supply while the Obama White House rejects any effort to try to label GMOs on a national basis.
#5) Increasingly dictatorial government health care
Obamacare will grow like a cancer, pushing Americans into mandatory vaccinations that inject children with mercury, formaldehyde, MSG and aluminum.
Look for the Obama administration to wage even more wars against raw milk freedom, farm freedom and food freedom, all while requiring yet more foods to be pasteurized or fumigated under the guise of “food safety.”
#6) Immediate surge in sales of guns and ammo
Obama has promised to try to destroy the Second Amendment and deny Americans the liberty to own firearms. With his re-election, expect to see a massive surge in gun sales as more people attempt to stock up in anticipation of gun bans (or government gun confiscation).
#7) Accelerated erosion of the Bill of Rights and civil liberties
Under Obama, civil rights, human rights and the Bill of Rights will be rapidly eroded. This goes hand in hand with the cancerous growth of government. As government expands its power and confiscates more economic resources, it simultaneously destroys individual liberties and due process.
This isn’t to say that Romney would have been any better, of course. Both candidates were philosophically invested in the rapid expansion of Big Government.
#8) Continued destruction and looting of the U.S. economy
Under Obama, the financial looting of the U.S. economy by the global bankster elite will continue. The same would have been true with Romney, by the way.
Under Obama, America’s unemployment rate will continue to head skyward, entitlements will be expanded, and the USA will be plunged into a tyrannical welfare state dominated by mindless zombies who have no cognitive grasp of reality.
#9) A “giant sucking sound” of employers leaving America
Ross Perot was right! That “giant sucking sound” is the sound of employers leaving America in droves, hiring offshore workers instead of creating jobs in the USA. And why? Because employers can’t afford to pay Obamacare mandates and still stay competitive in the global marketplace.
#10) Stepped-up attacks on veterans and preppers
Returning U.S. veterans will continue to be vilified by the Obama administration, to the point where even more veterans will be arrested as “terrorists” for engaging in fundamental preparedness strategies such as storing food, water, medicine and ammo.
Watch for the liberal media to join the White House in painting veterans as “dangerous” individuals needing psychiatric medications. Never mind the fact that the media owes preppers a huge apology in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.

Monday, November 5, 2012

Romney Landslide: Biggest Names Predicting How It Happen On Nov. 6

Benny Johnson - More and more pundits on both political sides are taking the electoral leap and predicting a landslide for Mitt Romney. Here are some notable ones:

1. CNBC Anchor Larry Kudlow

Romney Landslide: Here Are The Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen
Photo Credit: CNBC
Kudlow said on his CNBC show “The Kudlow Report” on Oct. 25:  ”I am now predicting a 330 vote electoral landslide.”

2.  MSNBC Host Joe Scarborough

Romney Landslide: Here Are The Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen
Photo Credit: NBC.com
Based on Scarborough’s insights on Politico:
“But my gut tells me there are two likely scenarios: (1) President Obama will squeak out a narrow Electoral College victory or (2) Mitt Romney will carry Ohio and be swept into office by a comfortable margin.
After practicing politics for 20 years, I suppose I would rather be in Mitt Romney’s shoes than Barack Obama’s. Incumbents who are under 50 percent two weeks out usually go down to defeat.”

3.  Strategist Karl Rove

Romney Landslide: Here Are The Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen
Photo Credit: FoxNation.com
Rove said Wednesday in the Wall Street Journal:
“In addition to the data, the anecdotal and intangible evidence–from crowd sizes to each side’s closing arguments–give the sense that the odds favor Mr. Romney. They do. My prediction: Sometime after the cock crows on the morning of Nov. 7, Mitt Romney will be declared America’s 45th president. Let’s call it 51%-48%, with Mr. Romney carrying at least 279 Electoral College votes, probably more.”

4.  Columnist George Will

Romney Landslide: Here Are The Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen
Photo Credit: YAF.com
George Will outlined a huge Romney Election Day in an interview on ABC’s “This Week,” predicting a 321-217 landslide that included nearly every swing state including Minnesota.

5.  Pundit Dick Morris

Romney Landslide: Here Are The Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen
Photo Credit: Mediaite.com
In a recent editorial for The Hill, Morris explained in detail his landslide prediction:
“Reasonable voters saw that the voice of hope and optimism and positivism was Romney while the president was only a nitpicking, quarrelsome, negative figure. The contrast does not work in Obama’s favor. His erosion began shortly after the conventions when Indiana (10 votes) and North Carolina (15) moved to Romney (in addition to the 179 votes that states that McCain carried cast this year).
Then, in October, Obama lost the Southern swing states of Florida (29) and Virginia (13). He also lost Colorado (10), bringing his total to 255 votes.And now, he faces the erosion of the northern swing states: Ohio (18), New Hampshire (4) and Iowa (6). Only in the union-anchored state of Nevada (9) does Obama still cling to a lead.
In the next few days, the battle will move to Pennsylvania (20), Michigan (15), Wisconsin (10) and Minnesota (16). Ahead in Pennsylvania, tied in Michigan and Wisconsin, and slightly behind in Minnesota, these new swing states look to be the battleground.”
Morris also predicted a huge day for the GOP in the Senate:
“The most likely outcome? Eight GOP takeaways and two giveaways for a net gain of six. A 53-47 Senate, just like we have now, only opposite. Barack Obama’s parting gift to the Democratic Party.”

6.  Columnist Micheal Barone

Romney Landslide: Here Are The Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen
Photo Credit: washingtonexaminer.com
The Washington Examiner columnist says Romney will walk away with 315 electoral votes:
 ”Bottom line: Romney 315, Obama 223. That sounds high for Romney. But he could drop Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and still win the election. Fundamentals.”

7. Las Vegas oddsmaker Wayne Allen Root

Romney Landslide: Here Are The Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen
Photo Credit: TheBalze.com
Root said in a column posted on FoxNews.com:
“I’m predicting a 5 to 7 point popular vote victory. Electorally it won’t even be that close. Romney will win many states that went to Obama in 2008. I’m predicting Romney victories in Ohio, Florida, Colorado, Virginia, Iowa, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Indiana. I predict a Romney victory by 100 to 120 electoral votes.”

 7. Israel

Romney Landslide: Here Are The Biggest Names Predicting It & How It Will Happen
Photo Credit: MittRomney.com
Abe Katsman of the Times of Israel writes of the Romney landslide among American voting in Israel:
“The Presidential election results are in.  Well, at least the votes from Americans in Israel.  Not one to keep readers in suspense, I’ll reveal the most important numbers up front: Gov. Mitt Romney received 85%–85%!–of the vote; President Obama managed only 14.3%.  This,  according to exit polling just released by iVoteIsrael, the non-partisan group promoting and facilitating voting by U.S. citizens currently in Israel.  Their statistics reveal some fascinating results.  More importantly, these results have implications for the outcome of next week’s election.  (Again, not to keep you in suspense: those implications favor the Republicans.)”

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Michigan Poll: Romney 47% - Obama 46%

Who are you most likely to vote for in the Presidential election - Democratic President Barack Obama, or Republican Nominee, Governor Mitt Romney, another candidate, or are you undecided?
Republican Nominee Mitt Romney 46.86%
President Barack Obama 46.24%
Another candidate 4.94%
Undecided 1.96%

Foster McCollum White Baydoun (FMW)B, a national public opinion polling and voter analytics consulting firm based in Michigan and representing the combined resources of Foster McCollum White & Associates (Troy Michigan) and Baydoun Consulting (Dearborn Michigan) conducted a telephone-automated polling random survey of Michigan registered and most likely November 2012 General election voters for Fox 2 News Detroit to determine their voting and issue preferences on the Presidential election.
The margin of error for this total polling sample is 2.24% with a confidence level of 95%.

Washington Redskins Lose Romney Next President of U.S.

The Redskins-Panthers game this Sunday could have quite an impact on Washington's chances in the NFC East while potentially breaking Carolina's season for good. But it wouldn't be surprising to see if President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney keep tabs on the game as well.
That's because the Redskins, in their final home game before voters cast their ballots, have become quite a predictor for presidential elections.
In 17 of the 18 contests in which the Redskins suited up before an election -- beginning in 1940 when the Redskins beat the Steelers and Franklin D. Roosevelt kept his presidency by vanquishing Wendell Willkie -- a Washington victory at home has signaled the incumbent party would keep the White House while a defeat has meant the opposite.
It's called the Redskins Rule, and it's fascinating.
The only variation in this rule from the past 72 years occurred in 2004 when the Packers beat the Redskins 28-14, which predicted that John Kerry would knock George W. Bush out of his job. That didn't happen, and the man who discovered the Redskins Rule has figured out a variation.
“I went back and studied the ‘Redskins Rule' data and what happened in 2004 was explained in 2000,” Steve Hirdt, executive vice-president of Elias Sports Bureau, told ESPN's Front Row. “Because Al Gore actually won the popular vote in 2000 -- but lost in the Electoral College -- it reversed the polarity of the subsequent election. The opposite of the usual ‘Redskins Rule' was true.
“Redskins Rule 2.0 established that when the popular vote winner does not win the election, the impact of the Redskins game on the subsequent presidential election gets flipped. So, with that, the Redskins' loss in 2004 signaled that the incumbent would remain in the White House.”
Luckily, order in the Redskins Rule was restored in 2008 when the Steelers easily knocked off the Redskins, allowing the opposing party to beat the incumbent.
So, when the Redskins and Panthers kick off this week, you can bet that Obama will be cheering hard for Washington and Romney will be praying Cam Newton finds last year's form. Unfortunately for Romney, six of the nine CBSSports.com expert pickers have selected the Redskins to win (though if it's any consolation, five of the eight are picking Carolina on points).

Pennsylvania Obama-Romney Tied At 47%-47%






Mike Wereschagin - President Obama and Republican Mitt Romney entered the final days of the presidential race tied in a state that the campaigns only recently began contesting, a Tribune-Review poll shows.
The poll showed the race for Pennsylvania’s 20 electoral votes locked up at 47 percent in its final week. Romney was scheduled to campaign in the Philadelphia area on Sunday, and former President Bill Clinton planned to stump for Obama on Monday. The campaigns have begun to saturate the airwaves with millions of dollars in presidential advertising.
“They’re both in here because of exactly what you’re seeing” in this poll, said Jim Lee, president of Susquehanna Polling & Research, which surveyed 800 likely voters Oct. 29-31. Most of the interviews occurred after Hurricane Sandy inundated Eastern and Central Pennsylvania. The poll’s error margin is 3.46 percentage points.
Nearly 60 percent of people say the country is on the wrong track, and economic concerns continue to dominate. Almost half of likely voters say economic issues are the primary driver of their choice for president.
“I’m concerned about all the young people graduating from college, whether they’re finding jobs,” said Pauline Hoxie, 84, a Republican from Jersey Shore in Lycoming County. Her grandson graduated with a degree in graphic design but works a manual labor job because he can’t find openings in his field, she said.
Democrats shrugged off the Romney campaign’s late play for Pennsylvania, sending emails to supporters and journalists showing past Republican presidential candidates doing the same thing. Pennsylvania hasn’t given its electoral votes to the Republican candidate since 1988.
The state’s urban, suburban and rural voters usually give winners narrower victories than Obama’s 10-point win in 2008. John Kerry won by 2.5 percentage points in 2004; Al Gore won by 4.2 in 2000.
The state is a tempting target for candidates in close races. It has two more electoral votes than the 18 up for grabs in Ohio, the focus of more campaign activity in the past few weeks than any other state.
“Some people call it fool’s gold. Republicans come close but it just doesn’t happen at the end of the day,” Lee said.
It could be different for the GOP this year, Lee said.
Pennsylvania’s unemployment rate surpassed the national average in September after remaining below average throughout the recession. In Ohio, where both campaigns have spent far more time and money, the unemployment rate was 7 percent in September, more than a percentage point lower than Pennsylvania’s 8.2 percent.
“There is no president who only deals with what happens during his four years,” said Lorraine Gregor, 61, a Democrat from McKees Rocks. “I don’t care who the president would’ve been when Barack Obama took office; we would be talking about the same thing today.”
The national unemployment rate was 7.9 percent in October, when employers added 171,000 jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
“I just don’t feel that President Obama is doing the job at all. What has he accomplished?” said Roger Briggs, 67, of Monongahela. He questioned why accused 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohamed and Fort Hood gunman Nidal Malik Hassan haven’t been tried. “They’re too lenient on these Muslims, these radical Muslims. He’s bending over backwards.”
Obama enjoyed wide leads in state polling during most of the race. That narrowed when Romney’s image improved as a result of the October presidential debates. Susquehanna found 48 percent of voters view Romney favorably, the first time he tied Obama on that measure. A Trib poll in September found Obama with a 47 percent favorability rating, compared with Romney’s 41 percent.
“We’ve continued to show the president failing to hit the 50-percent mark. Pennsylvanians have pretty much split their perceptions of him. Those perceptions are hardened; they don’t change,” Lee said.
What changed, he said, is Romney’s image among undecided voters: “Romney has given undecided a reason to vote for him.”
Romney’s image suffered among some voters because of comments he made at a fundraiser that 47 percent of people see themselves as victims entitled to government handouts.
Romney has since called the remarks “completely wrong.”
“I don’t believe Romney is concerned with the working class. I just don’t like how we’re looked at these days,” said Gregory Lutz, 64, a Democrat from Mildred in Sullivan County. Attacks that highlighted Romney’s foreign bank accounts sowed more doubt, he said.
Because he’s taken advantage of offshore tax benefits, “I don’t trust what he says about keeping jobs in the U.S.”
Pennsylvania’s sudden emergence as a state up for grabs shouldn’t surprise anyone, Lee said. Even when state polls showed a wide gap in Obama’s favor, the president rarely registered more than 50 percent, he said.
“I think it’s always been here for the taking,” Lee said. The question, he said, is whether Romney’s recent play for the state is “a day late and a dollar short.”

Obama And Democrats Playbook: Lying And Stealing Ohio

Tim Dunkin - If desperation had a smell, the air around the Democratic National Headquarters must be unbreathable.  The sense of impending doom emanating from the Left is palpable, despite all their attempts at bravado and putting up a confident front.  The polls from the professional polling houses continue to show Romney catching up with and even passing the President all across his electoral firewall – Wisconsin, Ohio, Iowa, Colorado, Virginia, New Hampshire, the list goes on.  When the Democrats have to spend money in states like Michigan and Pennsylvania – long thought to be safe for the President – you know they have good reason to panic.
Gallup polling shows Romney leading among early voters 52%-45%, and this despite the efforts of the President’s re-election team to turn out the vote and try to dominate the early voting scene, as he did in 2008.  Even then, reports suggest that while Romney’s campaign is turning out mostly low-propensity voters – folks who rarely vote, but are being asked to now and are doing so – leaving Romney with a large pool of regular voters for election day, Obama’s team has been cannibalizing their high-propensity voters to try to pump up his early voting numbers, leaving him with fewer reliable voters left on Nov. 6.  In suddenly swing state Pennsylvania, Romney is routing Obama in absentee ballot returns (which favored Obama in 2008).  Even Denver’s mayor – a reliable Democrat and surrogate for Obama on the campaign trail – is essentially telling crowds that they’re losing Wisconsin, another state that Obama won by double digits in 2008.
The Left knows they are in trouble.  This is why they seem so frenetic and desperate lately.  It’s not just the Obama campaign, either, though with the Romney-in-a-dunce-cap ad, and the repetitious “Romnesia” joke, and the desperate appeals to women voters to “vote like your lady parts depend on it” (as if women only care about access to free contraception and don’t bother their pretty little heads about complicated stuff like the jobs or foreign policy, that’s all stuff for men, according to the unspoken premise of the Obama campaign ‘s effort), Obama and his crew seem to be flailing every which way they can to try to grab hold of something solid.  Rank-and-file lefties are gravely concerned, as well. 
Even in Blue California, Obamatons have been vandalizing cars belonging to Romney supporters.  Barbra Streisand is sending out shrill, panic-stricken fundraising letters imploring Democrats to stop the Republican wave from crushing them – matching the administration’s own missives that are reportedly growing more desperate.  In Oregon, the AFL-CIO is sending out vaguely threatening mailers to voters, telling them that they “know your voting history” – it’d be a shame if sumthin’ was to happen to you because of it, you know?  Of course, this is understandable, since that latest two polls out of Oregon that I have seen show Obama leading Romney by only 5% and 2% - this in a state that Obama won by almost 16.5% in 2008.  All in all, the Democrats have a lot of things to be worried about.
Unfortunately, a cornered rat is the most dangerous kind of all.
The more desperate the Democrats are, the more rabid they will be about doing all the things that they have traditionally done to try to pull out tight elections, by crook and by crook.  In short, expect a LOT of fraud to take place in Tuesday’s election – nearly all of it perpetrated by the Democrat Party or their “non-partisan” surrogate groups.
For instance, how does one explain the fact that so many voting  machines in swing states are malfunctioning, in exactly the same way, so as to give votes for Romney to Obama?  Why does it seem like this never runs in the opposite direction, a voter having to punch the same key on the touch screen three or four times before their vote for Obama is accurately recorded? 
What about the old standby for Democrats – having people vote in the name of a dead person, or otherwise casting a ballot under an identity not one’s own?  That seems to be alive and well, too.  In North Carolina, 2,660 absentee ballots have been sent to voters over the age of 110 years old, most of them Democrats.  Astounding, you say?  Even more so, once we consider the fact that the number of people in the USA who are 110 or older right now should calculate to around 70 people, across the entire country.  Either North Carolina has discovered a magical formula for long life, or else there are fake votes being cast by dead Democrats.
Then, of course, you have the vote fraud being perpetrated by the still living, such as illegal Somalis being trucked in to Ohio polling places to vote for Obama.  Then, there’s just the more bargain-basement illegal use of government vehicles to bring voters to the polls by Democrat activists (it’s illegal because it can be seen as pressuring voters to vote a certain way).  And of course, yet another Democrat operative – this time the son of a Democrat congressman, the field director for his father’s campaign – was caught on tape giving tips on how to fake utility bills so as to commit vote fraud.  This comes on the heels of another Democrat operative who was captured on video giving advice as to defrauding the vote.  And let’s not forget the elegantly simple method of simply intimidating people into voting your way, as we have seen the AFL-CIO trying to do in Oregon above.
Buttressing these efforts are the attempts by the mainstream media to run polls that are heavily and unrealistically weighted toward Democrats in their turnout models (a topic which I covered in detail here), thereby giving the appearance of greater support for the President than he really has.  Once again, it must be reasonably understood that in a poll where Romney is winning independents by double digits, has virtually no gender gap (which is overrated anywise), and is showing significantly higher voter enthusiasm than his opponent, he cannot be losing.  These polls are faked – designed to dispirit Republican and conservative voters, motivate Democrats and lefties to get out to the polls, or some combination of the two.
These polls also serve another purpose – which is to support the meme-in-waiting among those on the Left that Romney “stole” the election.  This explains the recent short film by Michael Moore (not providing him with a link due to profanity, you’ll have to Google it) in which he rustles up some elderly voters and has them urge viewers to “not let Romney oust Obama” by stealing the election.  In other words, despite all of the voting machine errors that just so happen to benefit Obama, all the instances of illegal immigrants being trucked around the country to vote in Democrat precincts, how some Democrat-heavy areas seem to have more votes cast than they have voters year after year, all the videos of Democrat operatives explaining to voters how to vote multiple times – despite all of this, it’s really the Republicans that you have to worry about stealing the election?  Classic case of psychological projection there, Mike. 
Is it really just stupidity that impels him to make this argument?  Or is it that he and other lefties plan on swinging into action on Nov. 7 to try to overturn the results, should Romney win anything other than a decisive, overwhelming, Reaganesque landslide victory?  In short, are Moore and the rest of the far Left planning on using the very fact of a Romney victory as evidence for “Republican vote fraud” and “Romney stole the election”? 
Something to watch out for.  Be ready.  We have to win this thing, and do so beyond the margin of Democrat fraud